BROCKTON HIGH IS US! On page one, the New York Times bungles again. Why cant the Times read, write or cipher? // link // print // previous // next //
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 8, 2010
Milbanks revolution: Good God, but our culture is a joke! At a time of deep economic dislocation, we talk about who called Meg Whitman a whore. (This ate up the first fifteen minutes of todays Morning Joe.) We feign surprise when we learn that political ads are filmed with actorsand we pretend to be offended that someone used the word hicky.
A culture of feigned offense rules the land. At a time of peace and prosperity, this would be a massively stupid approachbut in a time of deep dislocation, this conduct is simply mad. Meanwhile, in todays New York Times, a full-page ad announces the fact that Mika Brzezinksi will present a Courage in Journalism award.
Have you ever seen anyone who was more afraid to state an opinion on any subject? Your upper-class culture is utterly mad, and your nation is rapidly dying.
How did we ever survive this long, given our massive dumbnessincluding our massive liberal dumbness? Three decades into a very effective war of disinformation against Social Security, our side has finally lurched into gear, trying to address the problemand displaying our vast lack of skill at such new undertakings (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 10/7/10). Meanwhile, we who have endlessly gotten our keisters kicked keep saying how dumb they are.
That said, we wanted to return to Dana Milbanks essay, which broke all established rules.
For decades, your public discourse has been scripted by skillful playersand by their skilled, clownish messaging. We have drowned in ludicrous statements on policy matters; we have drowned in ludicrous statements about targeted public officials. (If we lower the tax rates, we get higher revenues! The Clintons are serial murderers!) And no matter how stupid these messages got, the press corps agreed not to notice. Endlessly, Limbaugh got a pass. So did Chris Matthews, during the many years when he worked for plutocrat masters. (No one did more to send Bush to the White House. But for years after that, Joan Walsh had to keep kissing his keister, the better to get on TV!)
Last Sunday, the unimaginable happened! In the Washington Post, Dana Milbank penned a long essay about Glenn Beck, one of our most ludicrous clowns. In detail, he ran through the ludicrous things Beck tends to say. He even did a separate piece, describing one of Becks rhetorical techniques (just click here).
This type of piece has simply never been done in the past. It wasnt done about Limbaugh, Hannity or Jerry Falwell (who pimped the murder claims around). It wasnt done about Darling Chris, who was so useful to liberal business and career models even as he struggled and strained to do what Chairman Jack said. (Somehow, we liberals noticed Rupert Murdoch. Unable to walk and chew gum at one time, we never quite spotted Jack Welch.)
Milbanks piece isnt perfect. He leaves out some of the topics and themes Beck pursuestopics and themes which arent crazy. (Watching Beck in the past year, we saw many fascinating discussions of Dr. Kingmany long discussions.) But we were struck by Milbanks piece because such pieces have never appeared in the past twenty years. In a sane world, this sort of piece would appear all the time, especially given the utter lunacy of the American discourse. But the boys and girls of the mainstream press have been well behaved through the years.
Weve never seen such a piece before. This strange fact defines an agea brain-dead, plutocratic age from which your nation is dying.
PART 4BROCKTON HIGH IS US (permalink): In the wake of Davis Guggenheims Waiting for Superman, a generation of pundits have marveled at the way American kids cant read, write or cipher.
Look whos talking, weve endlessly said.
In fact, American students are doing much better in the past dozen years on our most reliable national tests, the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In reading and math, scores by black kids and Hispanic kids are a great deal higher. (This is one of the best-kept secrets in all of American life.) But will Americas upper-end journalists ever learn to reason or cipher? Consider the way Sam Dillon began a massive, recent report on page one of our great New York Times.
Dillon was praising one of the nations biggest high schools, Brockton High of Brockton, Massachusetts. He began with this thrilling, upbeat appraisal of a school which has turned things around:
From that, a reader might even get the impression that Brockton High outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools on this years state tests. But uh-oh! If readers did get that impression, they had been grossly misled. In fact, Brockton High recorded below-average scores in this years statewide testing in both math and reading (language arts). Across the state, tenth-graders recorded higher passing rates on both tests than the students at Brockton High did.
Example: Statewide, 75 percent of Massachusetts tenth graders passed the states math test this spring. Only 61 percent of Brockton High tenth graders passed. The school came closer in reading (language arts), but still didnt match the state norm. (For Brockton Highs official report card, click this.) Why then did Dillon seem to say that Brockton High outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools on this years state tests? His readers finally got their answerbut only if they read to paragraph 45 (out of 49), and only if they read his prose with cynicism and exceptional care:
Doh! In fact, Brockton High students had shown more improvement (in language arts scores) than students in 90 percent of state high schools! Presumably, something like that is what Dillon meant in his upbeat opening portrait.
(In fact, Fergusons report seems to say that Brockton High showed more improvement than 97 percent of state high schools in 2008. For the full report, click here.)
This year and last, Brockton outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools. Was Dillons upbeat opening portrait even technically accurate? Wed have to say it was not. In any normal sense of these terms, Brockton High didnt outperform 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools on the state tests this year, although the claim certainly made for a feel-good, front-page portrait. It also made for something elseit made for a nation of misled readers, to the extent that anyone actually cares about a topic like this.
Few readers showed any sign of understanding the facts about Brockton High. At her education site, Joanne Jacobs understood, and stated, the facts. (In overall performance, Brockton is below average, but much higher than it used to be.) But elsewhere, confusion reigned. Education writer Dana Goldstein showed no sign of understanding. Did Erica Leipmann understand the real facts at the Huffington Post?
From that, would you know that Brockton High scored below the state average in reading and math this year? But then, people all over the country seemed to be fooled by Dillons grossly misleading reportto the extent that anyone actually cares about such a topic. (Liberal journals, and liberal pundits, didnt comment at all.) In San Francisco, a school board member showed no sign of understanding what she had read. A talk show host seemed to be bamboozled at WGBH, Bostons PBS station. In the Albany Times Union, a distinguished teaching professor seemed to have no clue what hed read.
Generally, people pulled and reprinted that one pleasing quote. Brockton outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools, these misled New York Times readers said.
Dillons report was grossly misleadinga textbook case of journalistic incompetence, malfeasance and/or fraud. In a report which ran 1800 words, he never cited Brocktons passing rates; he never compared those passing rates to those of the state as a whole. But this is the way your press corps and educational experts have discussed public schools for at least forty years. Your public discourse is run by clownsby adult clowns who wonder why our children cant read, write and cipher better!
Currently, these adult clowns are having large cows about how lousy our schoolteachers are.
In fairness, Brockton High does seem to be an actual success story; its faculty does deserve praise for a decade of successful effort. The school serves a low-income student population; assuming its testing was properly conducted, the school does seem to be getting better results from its tenth-grade students than would be expected, based on the scores they achieved on state tests when they were eighth-graders. (This is the methodology used in the Ferguson study.) According to the Ferguson study, all population groups at the school showed unusual progress from the eighth grade through the tenth grade, especially in language arts. Like Dillon, the Ferguson study describes, in detail, the efforts made by Brocktons faculty to produce these gains in achievement. In Dillons report, this exemplary effort began more than ten years ago. By now, the results are in: Broken down by demographics, all segments of Brockton Highs student body seem to be (slightly) outscoring the state. But because the school is heavily low-income, minority and immigrant, its overall passing rates are lower than those produced by the state as a whole.
Sorry! In any normal sense of the term, Brockton High didnt outperform 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools on this years state tests. Overall, its passing rates were substantially below those of the state as a whole. That said, the school really is a success story, assuming its testing has been conducted correctly. Lets consider this matter two ways:
First, the good news:
On the one hand, Brockton High is us! This big high schools ongoing success resembles that of the nation as a whole. Across the nation, low-income, black and Hispanic kids have been doing much better in the past dozen years on our most reliable test battery, the National Assessment of Educational Progress. But this profoundly important fact has virtually been banned from the nations public discourse. Instead of seeing this basic fact reported, analyzed and discussed, we get the occasional bungled front-page report about some single high school which has made progress.
New York Times readers arent allowed to know that this is the general picture of test scores across the land.
Now, the bad news:
Dillon whistles, foot-stomps and cheers about Brocktons amazing success. He is so eager to tell his heart-warming tale, he grossly misstates elementary facts, misleading a nation of readers, but helping them feel very good in the process. Lets speculate a bit: How well have Brockton High students performed on an absolute basisin math, let us say? In the past few weeks, the nations pundits have shouted and yelled about how hapless our students are on international measures of science and mathon the 2006 PISA, for instance, which tested 15-year-old students. But uh-oh! In all likelihood, Brockton tenth-graders are scoring right around that levelthe level which has been reviled in the press corps in the past month, described as a symbol of failure! (In part, we base that calculation on Massachusetts passing rates on eighth-grade NAEP math tests.) Despite this, these students are featured on the Times front page, hailed as proof of the fact that a big high school can succeed! The package is tied with a pretty bow, with Dillon giving an utterly false impressionthe impression that this school has been transformed to such a degree that it has outperformed 90 percent of the high schools in Massachusetts, our highest-performing state.
What is the truth about our schools? One part of the truth is abundantly clear: People like Dillon (and his editors) should have been canned long ago. We live within a very strange culture, in which incompetent adults are hired to tell us how hapless our school children are. In the past few weeks, they have widened their range, attacking our children and our school teachers well. This echoes a decades-old plutocrat script, aimed at dismantling unions.
Brockton High teachers have made major progress. But then, so have teachers all over the nation, although nimrods like Dillon wont tell.
Can we talk? You will never see a great debate about our schoolsthe great debate the high Lady Collins imagined in her column last week. But if we wanted such a debate, we would follow these last few prescriptions. As you may know, we have offered six other prescriptions in our lost two posts:
The liberal world should support black kids: The liberal world quit on black kids long ago; we dont stop to dirty our hands with such matters. If we want that great debate, even race hustlers like Salons Joan Walsh would get their vaunted liberal journals into this discussion. Based on past practice, that will occur when the cow jumps over the moon. Liberals are too busy hunting bigots to bore their high-minded readers with the problems faced by black kids, Hispanic kids, immigrants, low-income children.
We should stop flying to Finland: Its an embarrassment when education correspondents fly to Finland to learn the secret of their success. Guess what? There isnt a school like Brockton High in the whole country of Finland! Unless were specifically looking for ways to improve results among middle-class kids, we should make our correspondents and experts stop taking these brain-dead junkets.
We should discuss our actual test scores: We knowthis was one of the prescriptions we offered in Wednesdays piece. But this is such a basic point, we decided to list it again. In the past dozen years, test scores are vastly improved on the NAEP. And guess what? Teachers like those at Brockton High have been behind this progress!
What do those improved scores mean? In this country, incompetents like Dillon (and his editors) never mention these test scores! Very few people have ever heard about these signs of progress. Is something wrong with those test scores? If so, someone should explain what it is. On the surface, things are improving in our schools. If anyone actually cared about kids, wed want to find out what it is.
But in truth, no one actually cares about kids within our upper-class aeries. At this point, our upper-end society has reached the point where it runs on nothing but novels. Scribes like Dillon type pretty tales about the occasional school which has outperformed 90 percent of Massachusetts high schools (wink, wink); they put this garbage on the front page, misinforming all who go there. In the meantime, they refuse to report the larger storytest scores are up all over the nation, not just at the admirable Brockton High! Keeping that startling fact to themselves, they waddle forth to do what plutocrats do. They trash the nations teachers and unions, even as they refuse to report the progress those teachers have wrought.
Trust us: Most teachers dont know about this progress, so well has the secret been kept.
How empty are the empty vessels presiding over our discourse? Here was the emptiest vessel of all, completing the recent column in which she proclaimed that a great debate has begun:
In her penultimate paragraph, Collins made the one good point of her column, recalling decades of facile clowning about reform in the schools. She didnt mention the actual score gains recorded in the past dozen years. Most likely, she has never heard that these score gains exist.
God forbid that such a high lady should thumb through such data herself!
(For all NAEP data, just click this. Plan to spend several weeks.)
Collins column was a groaner. The United States now ranks near the bottom of the industrialized countries when it comes to reading, she said, making a claim which is flatly inaccurate. Finland, whats your secret? the lady then stupidly asked.
She then defended the teachers unions, while making utterly worthless arguments. Again: She failed to mention the large score gains those unions have helped engineer.
At the end, she offered us proles some hope, as high ladies are trained to do.
We may be ready to fly, she proclaimed, giving us hope for the future. But what should we do to improve our schools?
Go aheadreread the whole column. This high lady didnt quite say.