FINALLY! After all these years, the Times explores the merits of Canadian health care: // link // print // previous // next //
WEDNESDAY, JULY 1, 2009
JOSH MARSHALL CANT COUNT TO SEVEN: How degraded has our pseudo-progressive movement become by this time? So degraded that weve reached the state where we cant quite count to seven.
Fallen? Inane? Sad/sick/soul-drained? What would be the word for the crap which appeared on Josh Marshalls site yesterday, shortly after noon Eastern? Rachel Slajda was the progressive reporter who got a bit lost on her way to seven. And dont worrythis doesnt end here:
Thats what Slajda wrote in her short news report, exactly as she wrote it. Amazingly, her confused work was still sitting on Joshs site at 9 oclock this morning. (Her report was still being linked from the top of TPMs front page.) A late update had been added. But the confusion over those very large numbers remained unaddressed.
Slajda had the right heroes and villainsbut her numbers were slightly confused. In her first paragraph, she said Sanford had met with his mistress in the past year more than the four times hed originally claimed. According to Slajda, he had now told the AP that the number is more like seven.
In the next paragraph, we were told (correctly this time) that the actual number is five. And no: As compared to four, five is not more like seven.
So it goes when simpering children are handed the keys to the web site. And heres how it goes when the staff of a Big Dumb Oaf cuts-and-pastes from such a site, as the staff in question pretty much does every night:
Eight hours after Slajda misfired, our own Big Dumb Oaf went on the air and recited her work almost word for wordonly choosing to drop her qualification about the number being more like seven. To wit: In the first paragraph cited above, Our Own Big Oaf reports that Sanford has admitted to seven meetings with his mistress over the past year. Immediately thereafter, Our Own Big Oaf reports that there have been five meetings...in the last year.
His big dumb staff didnt notice the contradiction. Neither did heif he bothers reviewing his staff-written scripts before he parades on the air.
How dumb has your pseudo-progressive world become? Thats how dumb, right there. And heres the question to which this leads:
Ten years ago, Josh Marshall was writing exceptionally smart, nuanced work for The American Prospect. Youre righthe took a large pass on the war being waged against Candidate Gore, in his own work and in the work he assigned as editor. But lets be fairJosh was young, and he had a future career to consider. As he told the New York Times in this profile, he was still imagining a possible career as a mainstream political journalist. And young liberals dont get those careersif theyre truthful about the work of the mainstream press corps.
Was that ever part of Joshs thinking? We have no idea.
Today, Josh runs a site to which young people can turn for photographs of the apartment in which the luv gov (or the randy right-wingertwo examples of TPMs recent language) shacked up with his mistress. They can go there for photo lay-outs inside the home of John Ensigns girl friend.
It can feel very good to rub your thighs when you look at pictures like that! Although its the hypocrisy involved in all this which makes us progressives so mad.
In short, Josh has turned into a first-class, low-IQ clown. (A first-class clown who makes decent money. In that same profile, he told the Times, ''I probably make in the neighborhood of what successful political journalists make. That would be pretty good scratch.) Meanwhile, how sharp is the audience he has assembled with his pictorials on the lov guv? As of this morning, there were 51 comments to Slajdas report. None of them inquired about its groaning contradiction. But then, Olbermanns staff didnt notice the contradictionthe contradiction Keith read on the air.
In our entire life, we dont think weve ever seen anyone dumb himself down to quite the extent that Josh has. And no: You will never get winning frameworks on major issues from a movement which has gone into the low-IQ pool the way his site has done in recent years. A progressive world this lazy and dumb will not produce winning frameworks on health carenot in the face of the endless image-shaping which comes from deeply serious, well-financed forces on the pseudo-right.
Go ahead. Reread what Olbermann told you last night. Weve got your health care frameworks right there! And make no mistake: Thats what your progressive world has become. As weve said, were all Kenneth Starr nowexcept Starr was perhaps a bit brighter.
In fairness, one distinction: Starr was troubled by the lying. Its the hypocrisy which make us so mad.
How dumb has your movement become: Sadly, this is the AP report to which Slajda linked. Sadly, Joshs agent thought this report said the number was more like seven. Eight hours later, Our Own Big Oaf said the same damn thing. Almost one day later, her bungled report was still being linked, uncorrected, from the top of TPM.
DUMBEST PERSONS IN THE WORLD: As weve told you, its Hard Pundit Law, enforceable by the Council of Experts. All press corps members must recite the cohorts Approved Standard Scripts. For that reason, the Washington Posts Ruth Marcus knew she had to type what follows, high up in todays silly column about (groan) Mark Sanfords wife:
As we told you last week: Pundits are required to recite this Standard Complaint concerning the way wronged wives will sometimes stand, looking stricken, by the side of the cheating pol. Maureen Dowd also ticks off this basic requirement, high up in her own nitwit column:
Mullahs always understand this. Until every mullah has issued a statement, the statement has not been made.
Beyond that, the ladies disagree today in their dueling, waste-of-time columns. Marcus simply adores Jenny Sanford, a new model for the wronged political spouse. Dowd lumps Jenny in with the rest, calling her various names as she goes. Jenny Sanford turns out to be undignified, passive-aggressive and weepy. She sounds like a stereotypical harridan, Dowd insightfully says.
Of course, no crisis goes to waste inside the high walls of Versailles. Dowd uses todays column to wack around Hillary Clinton, and Larry Craigs unnamed wifeand even Elizabeth Edwards! In the case of Edwards, this must have felt especially good. During the last campaign, Elizabeth Edwards couldnt be criticized because she seemed to be dying from cancer. Dowd was so frustrated by this restriction that she ended up venting her spleen at one point at the Edwards daughter, Cate, 25. (The youngsters web site displeased Dowd.) Today, she finally gets to address the real problem. At last! Elizabeth Edwards comes to grief in guide-points 7-10.
Is anyone dumber than the fools who live inside the walls of Versailles? In a related question: Do you wonder why these people do such a weak job with actual issues? That said, one part of Marcus column is worth special notice today. Youve sometimes thought we were off base when we noted the way the Council of Experts tend to look down their long Yankee noses at those dumb white southerners. Today, though, Marcus confesses:
Marcus is smart enough to omit one part of her confession. She omits the word southern from what shed heard about Jenny Sanford. By now, she knows that Sanford grew up in Chicagothat she was even an investment banker. All is therefore well with the world! And yes, this is how this works.
Gene Lyons has often written about the condescension brought to Arkansas in 1992 by the big-city Yankee reporters who invented the Whitewater pseudo-scandal, endlessly getting conned by local players in the process. As weve noted in the past, the fact that Clinton and Gore were both southerners did shape some of the press corps reactions. Remember: The mullahs who live inside Versailles walls are almost breath-takingly dumb.
Your nation is thus in a world of hurt. Will be, until theyre evicted.
FINALLY: We thought wed never see the day! Finally, in todays New York Times, were allowed to start learning the truth about Canadian health care. Credit givenand crow consumed! That done, lets state the obvious:
Its very important that voters know the facts about the way that system works. After all, here are two nations per capita health care costs from the year 2003:
Good lord! Per person, we spent twice as much! If Canadas health care is halfway decent, theyre doing something we should copy! Finally, the New York Times is starting to fill us in on how their system works!
We get the low-down from David Rakoff,, identified as the author, most recently, of Dont Get Too Comfortable. His piece is part of a sprawling, op-ed page homage to today, which is Canada Day.
In fairness, Rakoff keeps it short and sweet. No sense overloading the system:
That should do it, the editors said. With that, we were returned to a slightly more normal pursuit: Dowds listing of ten key guide-lines for political wives who are wronged.
By the way: All those wronged political spouses have access to excellent health care. And oh yes: In the past fifteen years, your progressive world has produced absolutely no frameworks with which we can successfully pursue progressive health care reform. Big newspapers failed to report on all those successful single-payer systems. And as they kept their big traps shut, your liberal journals all sat and stared.
Young progressive writers and editors pretty much chose to sit this one out. Why do you suppose that is? We could suggest some ideas.
Related question: On May 6, Naomi Klein appeared on The Rachel Maddow Show, exactly as wed demanded (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 5/7/09). Near the end of her monologue (Maddow clammed), she said that the greatest heist in monetary history is currently going down.
It has now been almost two months. Its weird, though! Have you seen Rachel invite her back to explain what she meant in more detail?
Just a question for non-millionaire stooges: Why do you think we havent seen Klein get invited back on that program? Small suggestion: Were getting fed a whole lot of mistress talk as that alleged heist rolls on.
They who inform/entertain you: Last night, Alison Stewart filled in for Maddow, offering the latest in mistress chatter. Since 2006, Stewart has been married to Bill Wolff, head of this channels prime time news programs. Such as they are, of course. Wolff had zero background in news when he landed the job.
Wolffs mother was an associate general counsel for Anheuser-Busch in St. Louis. But then, Stewarts father was senior vice president for corporate affairs at Squibb Corporation, the pharmaceutical company in Princeton. Were just saying. Click here. (Wolffs father is a cardiologist.)
Stewart has a winning smile and good hair. On the other hand, shes been in news for twenty years. Can you name anything you know because of that fact? You know us! Were just asking.