WILLING TO DO AND SAY SILLY THINGS! Tim always knew who the phonies were, Brokaw oddly explained: // link // print // previous // next //
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 2008
A GENTLEMANS WORDS APPEAR: Chris Matthews comments from last Friday night now appear on this MSNBC transcript, which now includes the 8 PM hour. (We think the original transcript was lengthened, but we arent completely certain.) As we type, MSNBCs 8 PM hour from Friday night is still absent from Nexis. Well discuss Matthews comments tomorrow.
THE HACKLEY SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS: Its been a long time since Margaret Carlson broke out of her Clinton/Gore-hating mold. But on last nights Hardball, she became the rare insider scribe willing to state the obvious. To her credit:
Its amazingthat pundits still feel they must speak in defense of Al Gore, even after he won the Nobel Peace Prize, even after he changed the worlds discussion. And its amazingthat so few pundits have ever stooped to making the obvious observations Carlson made last night. By the way, why did Carlson feel she had to speak in defense of Al Gore? Perhaps because the pundit corps is run by morons like this:
The man belongs in an institution. Throughout the program, Matthew displayed his wonderful wit, referring to Gore as the jowly green giant. The gentlemans joke was so moronic that it has been officially mis-transcribed. But yesthat really is what he said. He said it at least four times.
In what world do fools like this gain control of a nations discourse?
Then again, it wasnt much better on Mondays Countdown, where Keith-O asked hacktacular Richard Wolffe to discuss Gores endorsement of Obama. On what planet do nations go out of their way to import journalists like this?
Its not exactly a profile in courage! Is it possible to be a bigger fool than this hacktacular Brit?
For the record, Keith-O didnt do much better, making several snide remarks about Gores failure to endorse earlier. (Al Gore endorses Barack Obamareally going out on a limb there!) For ourselves, we would have been quite surprised if Gore had endorsed someone during the primaries. But thats the way the modern hack works. First, he make unlikely predictions, based on his hacktacular dumbness. Then, he starts making snide remarks when his predictions fail.
At any rate, heres the current MSNBC view of the world:
After winning the Nobel Peace Prize and changing the worlds discussion, the Jowly Green Giant endorsed Obama, though it wasnt exactly a profile in courage. If technology didnt let you see people this dumb, you wouldnt believe they existed.
By the way, whats the key fact from this profile of Olbermann? During the gentlemans formative years, he attended the Hackley School.
Many people have said such things in recalling Tim Russert, the person.
But journalists havent restricted themselves to discussing Tim Russert, the person. Theyve also discussed Tim Russert, the journalistand in those discussions, theyve lapsed into the types of industry agitprop that drives so much of their public conduct. On occasion, theyve also offered the types of discussion which provide a rare look at their actual world-views. On Monday night, for example, Chris Matthews began Hardball by saying the Hail Mary; he then staged a discussion of Irish Catholic culture to which well return by the end of the week (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 6/17/08). As weve told you through the years, major journalists almost never you tell the truth about their cohorts practices, outlooks and values. When Matthews, Barnicle and Pat Buchanan shared their views of Irish Catholic culture, you were given a rare look inside their mental worldinside a rarely-discussed part of NBC News.
Journalists have also discussed Tim Russert, the well-known public legend. Everyone knows the Standard Stories about Tims life and career, and journalist were quick to recite these stories in these recent discussions. On Meet the Press, we were struck by one exchange between Betsy Fischer, Russerts long-time producer, and Tom Brokaw, his long-time colleague and friend. In this exchange, Fischer continued to describe Tims personal decency. Brokaw, who seems like a decent person himself, quickly explained Russerts conduct:
Why would Russert go out of his way to speak to children who were facing challenges? Fischer described Russerts personal thinkingthe thinking of a decent man. And just like that, Brokaw supplied the Standard Explanation for Russerts personal decency. According to Brokaw, it was really testimony to Russerts working-class background when he did such things.
It would be hard to overstate how noxioushow destructivethis familiar part of modern press piety has proven to be through the years.
Russert came from the working class! To various journalistseven those as sophisticated as Brokawthis fact is constantly used to explain Russerts decency, fairness, diligence, wisdom, inerrant handling of all human tasks. On Monday evenings Hardball, Pat Buchanan offered a variant of the same theory:
Tim was great because he grew up in that working-class Catholic neighborhood, Pat told Chris and Mike. In simpler words, Tim was great because he grew up like us! But then, Brokaw comes from a working-class background too; his praise of Russerts decency can be read as a form of self-praise too. Go aheadreread what he said about Russerts decency in that exchange with Fischer. Mike [Barnicle] and I have talked about this a lot, he said, because we've shared so many common roots. In short, Tims decency was testimony to his working-class backgroundthe same background I, Brokaw, came from.
Lets say it again: Looking back on the past twenty years, it would be hard to overstate the damage done to the national interest by this self-pitying, self-glorying part of standard press corps thinking.
Brokaws explanation of Russerts personal decency is, on its face, fairly silly, of course; decent (and indecent) people come from all kinds of backgrounds. (No FDRs need apply!) But Russerts monumental working-class goodness is a foundational part of the well-known legend surrounding him in the press. For years now, journalists have said the silliest things in promotion of this Approved Standard Narrative. For example, here is Brokawapparently, a sensible manspeaking absolute perfect nonsense on Sundays Meet the Press:
If we believe what was said there, Tim Russertthe nations most important journalistalways knew who the phonies were because his one-man focus group in Buffalo would tell him. One prays this is just a silly tale. But Brokaw, bowing to press corps pieties, sat there and read it off straight. There wasnt the slightest hint that Brokaw didnt really believe this.
Brokaw was certainly right on one point; Russert did always say that silly thing about his focus-group father. In fact, Russert always said a lot of things about himselfabout his life; about his upbringing; about his father; about his birth neighborhood; about his own modesty; about his career. The things he said were almost always self-flattering and, once he became the nations most powerful journalist, endless flunkies fell into line, eager to repeat his stories. How silly were they willing to be? Here was Gene Robinson, reinventing the world in yesterdays Washington Post:
That whole paragraph has arrived here from Mars, but on what planet is that highlighted statement even dimly accurate? We wont tell you that Russert put on airs or pretended, but everyone thought of him as a regular guy, in large part because he worked so hard to promote such personal imagery. Much has been made of Russert's everyman persona? Thats true; much was made by Russert himself of this famous persona. Tim never forgot where he came from, pundits have robotically said. But then, no one could forget where Russert came from; the big guy wouldnt stop talking about ittypically, in well-crafted stories designed to reinforce the image of white working-class moral superiority. Buchanan basically stated the creed in the passage weve cited above, but it runs through an enormous part of the Russert legend. In the minds of his colleagues, these things were true: When Russert showed his personal decency, it was really testimony to his working-class background. When Russert seemed to be unique, it was because he came out of that working-class Catholic urban ethnic Buffalo neighborhood. On Sunday, we were even toldfor the ten millionth timethat Russert knew who the phonies were because his working-class father would tell him. Did Brokaw believe such a ludicrous thing? One hardly dares ask.
Unfortunately, it became somewhat obvious, in Russerts career, who he (and Big Russ?) thought the phonies might be. And well take a horrible guess: With so many people pandering to himrepeating tales of his moral greatnessit may not have occurred to this decent man that his judgments might even be faulty.
We have no doubt that Tim Russert, the person, was as decent as his friends say. But how good was Russerts judgment? Everyones judgment is faulty, of course. Thats why it isnt a great idea when a gaggle of simpering flunkies agree to recite the self-flattering tales of the nations most powerful journalist. A journalist who just happened to have grown up exactly as they had, of course.
WORTH REPEATING: We think what follows is well worth repeating. Whats remembered here is not nothing:
According to Fischer, and she convinced us: He always said the best exercise for the human heart was to bend down and pick someone else up. We think its worth repeating these portraits of Russert, the personal man.
TOMORROWPART 3: Everyone makes errors in judgment. Joe Klein and Chris Matthews discussed Tims.
FRIDAYPART 4: Uh-oh! We Irish do make wonderful prosecutors, Chris, Mike and Patrick all said.