ANOTHER BIG FISH OUT OF WATER STORY! On page one, the New York Times recycles a treasured old tale: // link // print // previous // next //
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2008
THE GREATEST PRO BOWL TALE EVER TOLD: Starting this weekend, theres no pro football on TV; we include the exhibition known as the Pro Bowl when we make that statement. If youre wondering what to do with your time, why not turn to the greatest Pro Bowl film ever madethe superlative girl power classic, Blue Crush? In the 2002 film, the main character gets to smooch a bit with a quarterback whos in the Aloha State for the Pro Bowland hes almost as handsome and nice as Tom Brady! But mainly, you get a superb reinvention of an iconic old tale youve seen a million timesabout men.
No, the surf footage wont seem quite as spectacular on a small screen in your home. But so what? When he reviewed Blue Crush, the Posts Michael OSullivan, to his vast credit, copped to both parts of its greatness:
As he closed, OSullivan said the surf footage was thrillingbut he said the girl power was thrilling as well. (OSullivan: Blue Crush is a clear-eyed portrait of the unique kind of power that women possess, a power that shows us that victory doesn't always mean vanquishing someone else.) We said this: Damn! Good for him!
We love this movie; so did our fellow Baltimorean, Ann Hornaday, who wrote a second review in the Post. Thats my sisterthats my sister! Its our favorite line in the film.
Its the greatest Pro Bowl tale ever told! After you watch it, just click here, and look in on poor David Shuster.
ANOTHER BIG FISH OUT OF WATER STORY: Why do public schoolsespecially low-income schoolsneed reliable annual testing? This front-page report in todays New York Times helps provide an answer.
The report, by Elissa Gootman, is a type of feel-good report big urban newspapers love. Its story-line just never gets old: Energetic, caring new principal turns urban school around. In Bronx School, Culture Shock, Then Revival, the Times front-page headline says. On page 14, the inside headline replaces revival with turnaroundand were told that we can check on-line video to learn how the school was reinvented. Meanwhile, back on the front page, we see the typical photothe principal smiling with a lucky student (not shown on-line). And in paragraph five, we start to learn how the principal, Shimon Waronker, turned Junior High School 22 around:
It really sounds greatif you stay on page one. [T]est scores have risen enough to earn J.H.S. 22 an A on its new school report card, were told. But if you keep readingif you jump to page 14then uh-oh! Youre also told this:
Weird! If you read page one, the school gets an A. On page 14, its listed as failingand it may have to be closed! (Note the language. In reports like this, when a school is listed as failing, this only means that critics say the school is far from perfect.)
In a rational world, you might expect a journalist to sort out the puzzlethe school which gets an A on page 1 is listed as failing on page 14. But this isnt a rational world; this is the world of front-page, feel-good stories about low-income urban schools. These stories make upscale readers feel goodand they show the good heart of the sponsoring newspaper. Perhaps for those reasons, Gootman makes no further attempt to describe this schools academic performance. For the rest of her 1700-word piece, its all fish-out-of-water, feel-good tales about the way this new Hasidic principal got his male students to read Jane Austen. And go to etiquette class.
If we sound cynical about this story, its because weve read it a thousand times, dating back to the early 1970s. Big newspapers love to recycle this tale, and they rarely look too hard at the kinds of data which may queer their story. (In February 2006, the Washington Post put a version of this smiley-face tale at the very top of its front page. The school in question turned out to have the second-lowest reading scores in the whole state of Virginia! See THE DAILY HOWLER, 3/20/06, with links to previous work.) Indeed, Gootman never bothers to say how a school which gets an A can also be a school which is listed as failing. And she makes no attempt to report the schools test scores. We hear Joel Kleins subjective viewsbut we get no objective data.
Why do public schoolsespecially low-income schoolsneed reliable annual testing? (Warning: A good deal of present-day testing is shaky, and its vastly over-stressed.) If the New York Times can write this piece about a school which does have scores, can you imagine the tales youd read in a world with no test scores at all?
The kids in that school deserve the best. Today, you get exactly one sentence which warns you: Yo, Times! Not so fast!
PHILOSOPHER FRIDAYS: Is on sabbatical. This highly controversial feature returns next Friday. Subject: That accessible style.
Meanwhile, yet another brush with greatness! We learned this week that we enjoyed a glancing childhood brush with consciousness kingpin Daniel Dennett! Going back to the second grade! Never mind how we found out.
According to Wikipedia, Dennett once claimed he introduced the frisbee to the UK. As usual, were left with our doubts.